Skip to main content
    Operations & Reliability

    The SSL Certificate Expiration Problem: Why Shorter Lifetimes Will Cause More Outages

    Shorter certificate lifetimes improve security, but they increase operational risk if organizations are unprepared. Learn why certificate expiration is a reliability problem, not a security failure—and how to prevent it.

    My-SSL Team
    January 9, 2026
    16 min read

    Introduction

    Core Thesis

    The transition from 398-day to 47-day certificate lifetimes (2026–2029) will multiply the number of renewals organizations must perform. Without mature automation and ownership models, this will result in more expired certificates, more service outages, and more operational incidents. The industry is trading one security risk (stale credentials) for another (operational fragility).

    If you've worked in operations long enough, you've seen it happen: a perfectly healthy service goes down because someone, somewhere, forgot to renew a certificate. The postmortem is always the same—monitoring gaps, unclear ownership, assumption that "someone else" was handling it.

    Now consider this: the CA/Browser Forum has mandated that certificate lifetimes shrink from 398 days to 47 days over the next three years. That's not a minor operational adjustment. That's a fundamental change to how certificates must be managed.

    This article examines why certificate expiration is primarily a reliability problem, not a security failure. It explores how the upcoming lifetime reductions will amplify existing operational risks, why automation alone won't solve the problem, and what organizations should do to prepare.

    What This Article Is Not

    This is not an argument against shorter certificate lifetimes. The security rationale is sound. This is an argument for taking the operational implications seriously before they become production incidents.

    SSL Certificates Already Cause Outages Today

    Certificate expiration is not a theoretical risk. It's a recurring cause of production incidents across organizations of all sizes. Industry surveys and public incident reports consistently show that expired certificates are among the most common causes of unplanned service disruptions.

    When browsers or clients encounter an expired certificate, they don't degrade gracefully—they refuse to connect entirely. There's no partial failure mode. The service is simply unavailable.

    Production Web Services

    HTTPS endpoints become unreachable when browsers reject expired certificates, leading to complete service unavailability.

    API and Service-to-Service Communication

    Internal APIs and microservices fail when mutual TLS certificates expire, causing cascading failures across distributed systems.

    Internal Tooling

    Monitoring dashboards, deployment systems, and internal applications become inaccessible, often at critical moments.

    CI/CD Pipelines

    Build and deployment systems break when certificates used for authentication or registry access expire silently.

    The Hidden Danger: Non-Customer-Facing Services

    The certificates most likely to expire are often those protecting internal services, staging environments, admin panels, and forgotten subdomains. These receive less monitoring attention but can cause significant operational disruption when they fail.

    Today, with annual certificate renewals, organizations that struggle with this problem can often recover before the next renewal is due. With 47-day lifetimes, there's no recovery period. The next renewal is always around the corner.

    What Changes in 2026–2029 (And Why It Matters)

    The CA/Browser Forum, through Ballot SC-081, has established a phased reduction in maximum certificate lifetimes. This isn't a proposal or recommendation—it's a binding industry requirement that all publicly trusted Certificate Authorities must implement.

    Certificate Lifetime Reduction Timeline

    EffectiveMax LifetimeRenewals/YearOperational Impact
    2024398 days~1Manageable with manual processes
    2026200 days~2Automation recommended
    2027100 days~4Automation required
    202947 days~8Automation mandatory

    Based on CA/Browser Forum Ballot SC-081. Validation data lifetimes will also decrease proportionally.

    The operational impact scales non-linearly. Doubling the number of renewals doesn't double the operational burden—it roughly doubles the number of opportunities for failure while keeping the blast radius of each failure unchanged. For a comprehensive breakdown of these changes, see our 2026 SSL Certificate Lifetime Changes guide.

    The rationale for shorter lifetimes is legitimate: limiting the window during which a compromised key can be exploited, ensuring certificate information stays current, and forcing organizations toward better automation practices. But rationale doesn't change the operational reality.

    Why Shorter Lifetimes Increase Failure Probability

    The logic is straightforward: more renewals mean more opportunities for something to go wrong. This isn't about the difficulty of any single renewal—it's about the cumulative probability of failure over time.

    More Renewals = More Human Touchpoints

    Even in automated environments, humans are involved: monitoring alerts, responding to failures, maintaining automation systems, updating credentials. Each touchpoint is an opportunity for error or oversight.

    More Automation Triggers = More Edge Cases

    Automation that runs once a year might encounter different conditions than automation running every 30 days. Network conditions, DNS propagation timing, API rate limits, and concurrent executions all become more relevant with higher frequency.

    Less Time to Detect and Recover

    With 398-day certificates, a failed renewal might be detected and fixed within the remaining validity window. With 47-day certificates, a renewal failure on day 30 leaves minimal time for detection, investigation, and manual intervention before expiration.

    The Math Isn't Complex

    If a renewal process has a 1% failure rate, a single annual renewal has a 99% success rate over the year. Eight renewals per year drops that to roughly 92% success rate—nearly an 8x increase in expected failures. Actual failure rates vary, but the principle holds.

    Why "Just Automate It" Is an Incomplete Answer

    The industry's standard response to shorter certificate lifetimes is: "Just automate your renewals." This advice isn't wrong—automation is essential. But it dramatically understates the complexity of doing automation well.

    Automation that works is invisible. Automation that fails is catastrophic. And most automation fails silently, providing false confidence until the moment of failure.

    Real-World Automation Failure Modes

    DNS Validation Failures

    DNS propagation delays, misconfigured CNAME records, or registrar API outages prevent domain validation from completing.

    Expired API Credentials

    The credentials used by automation systems to authenticate with CAs or DNS providers expire or get rotated without updating the renewal scripts.

    Broken CI/CD Pipelines

    Infrastructure changes break the deployment path for new certificates, leaving renewed certificates sitting in a queue.

    Certificate Deployed, Service Not Restarted

    The new certificate is installed on disk, but the web server or load balancer still serves the old, expired certificate from memory.

    Ownership Ambiguity

    Automation was set up by someone who left the organization. Nobody knows how it works, and nobody is alerted when it fails.

    Silent Failures

    Automation runs but fails silently. No alerts fire. The issue is discovered only when customers report the site is down.

    Tools like ACME (Let's Encrypt), cloud provider automation (AWS ACM, Cloudflare), and certificate lifecycle management platforms exist to solve these problems. But they require proper configuration, monitoring, and maintenance. They are not "set and forget" solutions.

    The Hidden Complexity of Certificate Ownership

    Ask any organization: "Who owns your certificates?" The answer is rarely straightforward. Certificates touch security policy, infrastructure operations, and application deployment—three domains that typically belong to different teams with different priorities.

    The Ownership Gap Problem

    Certificates often fall between teams. Each team assumes another team is responsible. The result: nobody is accountable until something breaks.

    Security Team

    Sets policy, audits compliance, may manage CA relationships

    Gap: Often doesn't own infrastructure to deploy certificates

    Platform/Infrastructure Team

    Manages load balancers, CDNs, and servers where certificates are installed

    Gap: May not know which certificates are critical to which services

    Application/DevOps Teams

    Owns services that use certificates, may have deployed their own certs

    Gap: Often not aware of organizational renewal processes

    Cloud Provider

    May auto-manage certificates for some services (ACM, managed SSL)

    Gap: Doesn't cover on-prem, hybrid, or multi-cloud environments

    This ownership ambiguity creates silent risk. Certificates managed by nobody are renewed by nobody. And when they expire, the first indication is often a customer complaint or a monitoring alert that fires too late.

    Shorter certificate lifetimes amplify this problem. Annual renewals might trigger annual conversations about ownership. Monthly renewals require continuous clarity about who is responsible for what.

    What Actually Prevents SSL Expiration Outages

    Preventing certificate expiration outages requires a systematic approach that goes beyond installing automation. The following checklist reflects practices observed in organizations with mature certificate management—not vendor recommendations, but operational reality.

    SSL Expiration Prevention Checklist

    Discovery & Inventory

    • Maintain a central inventory of all certificates across all environments
    • Include internal certificates, not just public-facing ones
    • Track certificate metadata: domain, issuer, expiry date, owner, purpose
    • Perform regular scans to discover unknown or rogue certificates

    Ownership Assignment

    • Assign a clear owner (team or individual) to every certificate
    • Document escalation paths for certificate-related incidents
    • Include certificate ownership in runbooks and on-call handoffs
    • Review ownership when team members leave or change roles

    Expiry Monitoring & Alerting

    • Set up alerts at multiple thresholds (60 days, 30 days, 14 days, 7 days)
    • Alert to team channels, not just individual email
    • Test that alerts actually reach the right people
    • Monitor certificate transparency logs for your domains

    Renewal Process

    • Automate renewal where possible (ACME, cloud provider automation)
    • Test automation regularly—don't assume it works until you verify
    • Perform renewal dry-runs before actual expiry
    • Have manual renewal procedures documented for when automation fails

    Post-Renewal Validation

    • Verify the new certificate is actually being served after deployment
    • Check that services were reloaded/restarted to pick up new certificates
    • Confirm certificate chain is complete and valid
    • Test from external points to catch CDN or caching issues

    For organizations starting from scratch, the first step isn't automation—it's visibility. You cannot manage what you cannot see. Start with an inventory, assign owners, set up basic monitoring, and then layer in automation incrementally.

    Why This Problem Extends Beyond SSL

    SSL/TLS certificates are not unique. They are part of a broader category of cryptographic credentials and identity artifacts that require lifecycle management. The challenges discussed in this article apply equally to:

    • Code signing certificates – used to sign software releases
    • SSH keys – used for system access
    • API tokens and service accounts – used for machine-to-machine auth
    • JWT signing keys – used for application authentication
    • Mutual TLS certificates – used for service mesh and zero-trust

    The Bigger Picture: Identity Lifecycle Management

    Certificate management is increasingly viewed as a subset of identity lifecycle management—the practice of managing how machine and workload identities are issued, rotated, and revoked. Organizations investing in certificate automation today are building foundations for zero-trust architectures.

    Additionally, the transition to post-quantum cryptography will require organizations to rotate certificates more frequently as new algorithms are deployed. Organizations that struggle with 47-day SSL certificates will struggle even more with post-quantum migration.

    Resources for Managing Certificate Lifecycles

    The following resources provide additional guidance on certificate lifecycle management:

    Internal Resources

    External References

    • CA/Browser Forum – Industry standards body for certificate issuance
    • Certificate Transparency logs – Browser-mandated public logging of certificates
    • ACME protocol specification – Standard for automated certificate management

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Take Action Before the Deadline

    The 200-day maximum takes effect in March 2026. If your organization hasn't audited its certificate inventory and renewal processes, now is the time. The goal isn't perfection—it's visibility and ownership. Start by knowing what certificates you have and who is responsible for them.

    My-SSL Security Team

    SSL Experts

    The My-SSL Security Team brings over 15 years of combined experience in SSL/TLS certificate management, web security, and PKI infrastructure. Our team regularly contributes to industry standards and provides guidance to thousands of businesses securing their online presence.

    SSL/TLS Specialists
    PKI Infrastructure
    Web Security
    Published: January 9, 2026
    About Our Team

    Editorial Standards: All content is reviewed by our security experts for technical accuracy. We follow industry best practices and reference official CA/Browser Forum guidelines.Learn more about SSL security.